• Home
  • About
  • CBS Interactive
  • Cambodia
  • Freelance
  • UN/IOM
  • BUSINESS DAY
  • MEDILL
Menu

Jonathan Greig

Street Address
City, State, Zip
Phone Number

Your Custom Text Here

Jonathan Greig

  • Home
  • About
  • CBS Interactive
  • Cambodia
  • Freelance
  • UN/IOM
  • BUSINESS DAY
  • MEDILL

Twitter looks to strengthen policies prohibiting 'dehumanizing speech' →

September 26, 2018 Jonathan Greig
Image: Twitter

Image: Twitter

The social media giant is asking the public to give feedback on new rules designed to limit language that normalizes violence against anyone.

Twitter users -- particularly women and minorities -- have long complained about the platform's lax rules against open hate speech and harassment, but the massively popular social media site has been slow to change its ways.

It is now trying to make up for their past mistakes by beefing up its rules and expanding its hateful conduct policy, announcing on Tuesday that it would be creating new regulations to stop what it called "dehumanizing speech."

Critics have repeatedly and harshly assailed Twitter for years due to their rules stating that a comment must be directed at a specific person to fall under the hateful conduct policy. Wired Magazine put it succinctly, writing that previously, a Twitter user would be allowed to write something like "all women are scum and should die" because it was not directed at a specific woman.

Twitter's Vice President of Trust and Safety Del Harvey and Vijaya Gadde, a member of the legal team at company, wrote in a blog post that the new dehumanizing speech policy is an effort to address comments just like this and make people feel safer using the platform.

"Language that makes someone less than human can have repercussions off the service, including normalizing serious violence," the company wrote. "Some of this content falls within our hateful conduct policy...but there are still Tweets many people consider to be abusive, even when they do not break our rules."

Harvey spoke honestly with Wired about the social media site's failure to be more open about its more controversial policies, and hoped this new effort would be a step in the right direction. Twitter worked with their Trust and Safety Council -- a group of NGOs and organizations that provide input on Twitter's policies -- as well as its development teams to come up with the new rules. It now would like the public to comment on it and share any thoughts or suggestions on how Twitter can better curtail hate speech.

"For the last three months, we have been developing a new policy to address dehumanizing language on Twitter. Better addressing this gap is part of our work to serve a healthy public conversation," Harvey and Gadde wrote.

"With this change, we want to expand our hateful conduct policy to include content that dehumanizes others based on their membership in an identifiable group, even when the material does not include a direct target."

The management of hate speech has been a particularly thorny issue for Twitter, whose CEO, Jack Dorsey, has repeatedly decided against more stringent rules, wary of doing anything that would even hint of limiting free speech. Just last month, he was forced to permanently ban conspiracy theorist Alex Jones after YouTube and Facebook initially banned him for his targeted harassment of parents who lost children during school shooting incidents.

At first, Twitter spent weeks refusing to ban Jones from using their site, claiming he had not broken any rules. Dorsey openly defended the move, writing on Twitter that the company would not be cowed by public pressure and wouldn't take "one-off actions to make us feel good in the short term." He caused further uproar by suggesting it was the responsibility of journalists -- and not the websites giving Jones a platform -- to combat the hate speech Jones openly trafficked.

But after multiple media outlets pointed out dozens of Jones' Tweets that directly contradicted Twitter's rules, the social media site was forced to relent and remove his account. This debacle prompted Twitter security VP Harvey to send a confusing email to Twitter's staff claiming the company was simply following its own rule book by initially keeping Jones and then later suspending him. But after defending its moves, she said they planned to move quicker than expected on the dehumanizing speech effort and other initiatives to address similar issues.

Twitter is giving users until October 9 to respond to a survey about the new rules on dehumanization, and will review the comments as they try to implement the new policies. Users of the site have previously been skeptical of the rule changes because many of the current regulations that are already on the books are applied haphazardly, with seemingly little reason behind which Tweets get removed and which are allowed to stay.

The blog post from Twitter goes on to reference studies from researchers showing the negative effects of widespread hate speech on populations and the need for large platforms like Twitter to be aware of how their site is used by hate groups.

Social media sites across the world continue to struggle with balancing free speech against hate speech. Facebook has faced an avalanche of criticism after it was implicated by the United Nations in their report on the Rohingya genocide crisis in Myanmar. Human rights workers said Facebook allowed the senior generals of Myanmar's army to use the platform to not only spread racist, misogynistic misinformation about the Rohingya ethnic group but stoke racial animus toward the group, giving the army further justification for their harsh -- and illegal according to the UN -- actions. Last month, Facebook removed the accounts of 20 officials in the Myanmar government for their actions during the genocide.

"Although improved in recent months, Facebook's response has been slow and ineffective. The extent to which Facebook posts and messages have led to real-world discrimination and violence must be independently and thoroughly examined," the UN panel told Reuters late last month.

*this article was featured on Download.com on September 26, 2018: https://download.cnet.com/blog/download-blog/twitter-looks-to-strengthen-policies-prohibiting-dehumanizing-speech/

In cbs interactive Tags twitter, dehumanizing speech, hate speech, tweetbot, download.com

Twitter disables core features on third party apps like Tweetbot with recent API changes →

August 17, 2018 Jonathan Greig
(Credit: Pixabay)

(Credit: Pixabay)

Twitter's new restrictions on its most avid users are designed to force more people, and ads, onto the app.

Twitter has finally gone through with changes to its API that restrict features offered by popular third-party apps like Tweetbot, Twitterrific, Talons and Tweetings. Some, like Favstar, have already gone offline since Twitter made the decision to wrest control of its social service away from outside developers responsible for so many of the platform's most popular and vital features.

"We feel the best Twitter experience we can provide today is through our owned and operated Twitter for iOS and Android apps, as well as desktop and mobile twitter.com," senior Twitter product direction Rob Johnson said in a blog post on the move.

"We know some of you don't like this more focused approach. There are good reasons you love the various Twitter apps you have used over the years, and we're grateful for the developers who build them."

The changes to the API will bar many users of third-party apps from updating their feed quickly, delay notifications for messages, and completely disable notifications for likes, retweets, follows, and quotes. Other tracking features have also been disabled, and Twitter stated emphatically that they will not be replacing these functions with their new Account Activity API.

In a letter written to Twitter employees yesterday, Johnson put the onus on third-party apps while acknowledging that the company has not been good about explaining a variety of moves designed to set limitations on the reach of third-party apps.

"In 2011, we told developers (in an email) not to build apps that mimic the core Twitter experience. In 2012, we announced changes to our developer policies intended to make these limitations clearer by capping the number of users allowed for a 3rd party client," Johnson wrote.

"It's time to make the hard decision to end support for these legacy APIs -- acknowledging that some aspects of these apps would be degraded as a result. Today, we are facing technical and business constraints we can't ignore," he added.

"The User Streams and Site Streams APIs that serve core functions of many of these clients have been in a 'beta' state for more than 9 years, and are built on a technology stack we no longer support."

Johnson's message to Twitter employees was a bit different than the public post he sent out, which trumpeted Twitter's own app and web platform over any third-party apps. He claimed the changes to Twitter would help the company control "troll-like behavior," enforce guidelines, quicken search functions, and more.

Many of the app developers affected by the move blamed it advertising dollars, claiming Twitter was trying to force its most avid users to use their platforms to increase ad revenue.

Twitter user Ash McAllan criticized the changes but said users had no choice but to accept the changes because it was difficult to re-create the communities that have formed on the platform.

"Yes, Twitter as a platform is bad and getting worse, but I cannot afford to migrate away from a system where I've built a community and audience I love in favour of other platforms where that's actively harder to do," she wrote. "Marginalised folks can't afford to 'just rebuild'."

Johnson was open about the already-negative responses to the changes, even citing the #breakingmytwitter movement growing on the platform while claiming the company was "committed" to understanding why so many of its users liked third-party applications better than the Twitter app itself.

"We are not changing our rules or setting out to 'kill' 3rd party clients; but we are killing, out of operational necessity, some of the legacy APis that power some features of those clients," Johnson said, claiming that it "wasn't realistic for us to invest in building a totally new service to replace all of the functionality of these APIs."

Outside developers have been integral to Twitter's success and popularization over the years, creating and spearheading some of the apps' now integral features like the hashtag and the quick refresh feature.

"3rd party clients have had a notable impact on the Twitter service and the products we built. Independent developers built the first Twitter client for Mac and the first native app for iPhone. These clients pioneered product features we all know and love," Johnson said on Twitter.

New York Magazine highlighted the fact that even the word "tweet" was created by outside developers who needed a design-friendly term for the act of sending a Twitter message. Twitter absorbed Tweetdeck after it became a popular third-party app for many of their most avid users.

Twitter had to push back the date the changes would take effect after announcing it last year. They originally planned to institute the changes in June but pushed it back to this month to give third-party apps more time to update themselves in advance. Many of the most popular third-party apps have already released updates to their apps with reduced and scaled back features, much to the dismay of users.

*this article was featured on Download.com on August 17, 2018: https://download.cnet.com/blog/download-blog/twitter-disables-core-features-on-third-party-apps-like-tweetbot-with-recent-api-changes/

In cbs interactive Tags twitter, apps, download.com, tweetbot, twitterrific, tweetings, api

POWERED BY SQUARESPACE.